What’s New
NEW
ADDRESS
Purcell & Wardrope, Chtd. has moved to its state of the art
offices at 10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1200, Chicago, Illinois
60603. Its telephone number, facsimile number and e-mail addresses
remain the same.
COURT FINDS NO COVERAGE ON UIM CASE
Tom Underwood
obtained summary judgment on behalf of the insurance carrier in
an underinsured motorist case. The Court found that there was
no duty for the excess carrier to offer UIM coverage and that
the declarations page did not create an ambiguity in the policy.
ETHICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH/ADDICTIONS:
WHAT SUPERVISORS NEED TO KNOW
Tom Underwood
and Jennifer
Simms recently presented a seminar "Ethical and Legal
Issues in Mental Health/Addictions: What Supervisors Need to
Know" for the Academy of Addictions Treatment Professionals.
Anyone interested in having the seminar for their office should
contact Tom Underwood.
AMTRAK LITIGATION RESOLVED
On the day of the 1999 Amtrak derailment, Brad
Purcell was called out to investigate and then represent the
truck driver, John Stokes, and his employer, Melco Steel. After
years of litigation, Brad was able to resolve the 95 lawsuits
within Melco’s primary policy limits.
STATELINE EXPLOSION CLAIMS DISMISSED
Brad Purcell
represented an electrical company named as a defendant in seven
cases resulting from the 1998 explosion at the State Line Generating
Plant in Indiana. Brad achieved dismissal of its client without
payment in 6 of those cases. The seventh case recently settled.
Our client paid only 1.1% of a multi-million settlement.
SECURITY COMPANY SUMMARY JUDGMENT
On June 22, 2006, Brad Purcell had summary judgment
granted in favor of his client, a security company, in
connection with five consolidated cases arising out of the
February 5, 2001, multiple homicide incident at a Melrose Park
manufacturing plant.
THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TOXIC TORTS
Tom Underwood
and Thomas
Kanyock recently presented a seminar "The Epidemiology of
Toxic Torts" for one of the firm's insurance clients.
Anyone interested in having the seminar for their office should
contact Tom Underwood.
EMPLOYERS TORT LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEES' INJURIES
Jennifer Simms'
article "Employers' Tort Liability for Employees' Injuries:
A Primer" was published in the November issue of the Illinois
Bar Journal. (Reprinted with the permission of the
Illinois Bar Journal, Vol. 94 #11 November 2006 Copyright by the
Illinois State Bar Association, on the Web at isba.org).
SETTLEMENT STRATEGIES AND NEGOTIATION TECHNIQUES
Brad
Purcell recently presented an all day seminar on the topic
of settlement strategies and negotiation techniques for an
insurance company client in Ohio.
BRADFORD S. PURCELL OUTSTANDING PRESENTATION
Brad
Purcell spoke on the topic of handling premises liability
claims and litigation at the annual PLRB/LIRB Claims
Conference held in Nashville, TN on April 3 and 4, 2006, and
received the Outstanding Presentation Award at the Presenters'
Luncheon in connection with his seminar.
NATURAL ACCUMULATION RULE
Brad
Purcell achieved summary judgment for a retail client in a
slip-and-fall case relying on the "natural accumulation" rule.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON STRICT PRODUCT
LIABILITY AND NEGLIGENCE
Brad
Purcell successfully argued a Motion for Summary Judgment
on behalf a product manufacturer sued in a strict product liability
and negligence action as a result of a worker who required amputation
of three fingers after coming in contact with an accessory attached
to the product.
COURT DISMISSES CLAIM FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
Jennifer
Simms won her motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims that
they were entitled to pre-judgment interest on a legal malpractice
case.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OBTAINED ON CONSUMER
FRAUD AND CONSPIRACY CLAIM
Jason
Friedl obtained summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims
for consumer fraud, conspiracy and negligent hiring with regard
to a vehicle stolen from a restaurant’s valet parking lot.
TRIAL AND ARBITRATION WINS
Jason
Friedl recently won two trials defending trucks involved in
motor vehicle accidents. Additionally, he won two arbitrations
where claims were being made against retail establishments for
injuries on their premises.
TOP